October 21, 2004. It is hard to believe anyone would vote for John Kerry. Everything he stands for points directly to Communism. I have actually criticized President George W. Bush in my writings more than I have Kerry. Why, you ask? Bush either has some terribly wrong headed ideas, or he is letting advisors do too much thinking for him. I am critical of Bush because I think too many people blindly accept him because he is less liberal than Kerry. The reason I have written so little about Kerry is for the simple reason that he is absolutely untrustworthy, and I just keep thinking surely at some point everyone else will see that. He's Bill Clinton without the finesse. John Kerry lies constantly. Many people do not understand what he believes because he keeps changing his stories. Those who are the least bit informed understand that Kerry committed traitorous acts when he returned from Viet Nam and sharply criticized (likely lied) the military while we still had troops in the war. He also met with the enemy. Kerry's voting record in the Senate has shown him to be the most liberal senator in Congress, and he has voted 100 percent of the time the same way any Marxist would vote. He would not, as Commander in Chief, protect America; he has stated that the U.N. should be in charge. He has made a mockery of religion, claiming his faith guides him, but it doesn't affect decisions he makes. Of course, his real religion is Communism, and it affects everything he does.

Bush has some faults, but Kerry has nothing to offer. Our republican form of government is in serious trouble when Bill Clinton, Al Gore and John Kerry are the best one party can put up for election to the highest office in the land. The Republican Party when in control of things by a slim margin does better than the Democrats. Kerry has hired 30,000 lawyers to contest the election before the election is held. What does that tell you about Kerry? Here's a better question; what does that tell you about America? I can tell you what it means; the republican form of government whereby we select honorable men to represent us, is HISTORY..........and that's......

.........My Biased Opinion

Rather Large Issue

September 17, 2004. Perhaps you have never smelled a dead horse, but Dan Rather of CBS is surely sitting on one that really stinks because it has been dead so long. For nearly two weeks Rather has stood by a story with more holes than a new block of Swiss Cheese. I don't think you have to be stupid to watch and listen to Dan Rather, but the way he has been acting since he aired a piece on "60 Minutes" attempting to discredit President Bush's service in the Air National Guard you'd have to conclude that Rather thinks his viewers are stupid. Rather is at the very least, out of touch with the reality of the Internet and how the "Jammie Brigade" can get the truth out all over the world quicker than Dan can type out today's CYA memo on his 1952 model Royal Typewriter. I bet he is typing a lot of those CYA memos right right now. Pretty ironic if you think about it, how the forged memo was referenced as CYA; he just didn't realize he would be living that scenario. After the Jammie Brigade of bloggers, Internet news services and Fox news conclusively proved that Rather was using a bogus memo, a forgery, literally a fake document to make Dan's case, he had the audacity the say people are missing the "larger issue", the questions raised about Bush's service in the Guard. Like it or not Dan, you are the larger issue even if you are not running for president. Could we ask the question, "What did Dan know, and when did he know it?" Stories based on lies with the intent to influence millions of viewers is serious stuff.

Can you believe Rather thinks his audience is so dumb? He is basically saying that even though the documents he used to make his case against Bush were frauds, we need to believe the documents tell the truth. In other words, in Rather's demented mind he is thinking his story about Bush is the truth even if you and I know he used a lie to expose "his truth". Come to think of it that is the mindset of liberals; "there are no absolutes, no absolute truth, but everyone has to discover his own truth", just like New Jersey Governor James E. McGreevey saying "My truth is that I am a gay American." Dan has his own truth. Maybe his is, "I didn't like George W H Bush when he was president and I don't like his son President George W. Bush, and I will do just about anything to force my views on others." I wonder how long Dan Rather will continue to arrange the deck chairs on the "unsinkable" CBS?

So now that CBS and Dan Rather have been exposed for their reckless use of the facts with the "60 Minutes" program about President Bush they are the laughing stock of the real truth seekers. For being exposed as frauds, none are more deserving than these two ........and that's .........

.........My Biased Opinion